|
World-Class
Embryologist Makes Medical Breakthroughs
for Infertile Patients
Since
1987, world-renowned embryologist Jacques Cohen,
Ph.D., Scientific Director of Assisted Reproduction
at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, and his research
team have quietly accomplished almost every major
medical breakthrough in the field of reproductive
medicine. Despite these accomplishments, Dr.
Cohen and his staff have largely remained the unseen
players behind millions of pregnancies for previously
infertile couples.
“There is no other field in medicine
where you have another specialty involved to so large
an extent in addition to the physician who treats the
patient,” says Dr. Cohen. “Our embryology
laboratory is open seven days a week and is among the
top five in the nation in terms of patient volume*.
More importantly, our laboratory is at the forefront
in terms of developing reproductive strategies for
the future to continue to give patients the best possible
chance of having a baby.”
Patients are familiar with the vital
role of the reproductive endocrinologist who diagnoses
the cause of their infertility, administers a course
of treatment and harvests eggs for those who require
assisted reproductive technology. What they may not
realize is that once the eggs are removed, it is the
embryologist who unites the egg and sperm in the laboratory
using one of any number of sophisticated techniques.
Although patients rarely interact with the embryologist,
his or her work helps determine the success of their
procedure.
If the sperm fails to penetrate the egg
during in vitro fertilization (IVF) or if the embryo
fails to implant successfully, several other methods,
known as micromanipulation techniques, may be employed.
The following methods were either invented or pioneered
by Dr. Cohen and his team of scientists and embryologists:
assisted fertilization that later lead to the development
of ICSI (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection) that was
fine-tuned by others, Assisted Hatching, Fragment Removal,
Embryo Co-Culture, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis,
Blastocyst Culture and Cryopreservation, Cytoplasmic
Transplantation and Single Sperm Freezing.
“In the last four years since joining
the staff at Saint Barnabas, the Institute team has
developed seven different potentially therapeutic and
diagnostic laboratory technologies,” continues
Dr. Cohen.
Because the role of the embryologist
is crucial to the success of a fertility center, the
experience of these individuals is the most vital measurement
of competency. The field of assisted reproduction is
relatively young, with the birth of Louise Brown—the
first “test tube baby” in 1978—marking
the start of the specialty. Dr. Cohen began working
in clinical assisted reproduction over 20 years ago,
making him one of only a handful of embryologists to
have worked since the start of the field.
While studying molecular biology as a
graduate student in the Netherlands in 1975, Dr. Cohen
responded to a bulletin board advertisement seeking
master’s degree candidates to work on a new technology
called in vitro fertilization.
He enjoyed the work immensely, continued
to pioneer new developments and was even hired by the
team that produced Louise Brown to develop a process
of freezing and storing embryos (cryopreservation).
From one small posting, Dr. Cohen built a career around
his love of embryology, applied science and medicine.
The only way to become an expert in the
field of clinical embryology is to learn from others
over time, Dr. Cohen relates. The Saint Barnabas embryology
team, including accomplished embryologist and IVF Laboratory
Director G. John Garrisi, Ph. D., has a combined total
of 138 years of experience. Qualities Dr. Cohen attributes
to outstanding embryologists include manual dexterity,
patience, experience, quality control and the ability
to make crucial decisions because eggs, sperm and embryos
all vary greatly. Dr. Cohen adds that he and
his team view eggs and sperm, whether fertilized or
not, with “total respect because they are a potential
human life.”
Another area where the experience of
the embryologist plays a critical part is the speed
at which the professional can perform an assisted reproductive
technique. For every hour of the process and every
procedure done, a loss of eggs, sperm and embryos occurs.
“There is no cookbook of embryology
techniques because the field has not existed that long,” Dr.
Cohen says in summation. “There is no school
for becoming an embryologist. We have some guidelines
now but that does not mean they will be done correctly
by an inexperienced person. Frequently I hear of people
making mistakes that we discovered and refined years
ago. It is the experience that makes an embryologist
and that is why there are still so few of them.”
All of the behind-the-scenes technology
and dedication the Institute team brings together are
focused on one overreaching goal: making the dreams
of infertile couples come true. Dr. Cohen’s goals
for the future of his program include determining with
greater accuracy any problems with eggs and sperm before
implantation, as well as determining which genes are
most involved with early development.
“We try our very best every day
to make people happy,” says Dr. Cohen.
Visit www.cdc.gov for
the latest Clinic Specific Report by the Society of
Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART).
[ top ]
Institute Announces
New Physician Leadership
The
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Saint Barnabas
Medical Center was pleased to welcome new physician
leadership at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine
and Science as of October 1, 1999.
David Sable, M.D., was named as the new
Director of the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology
and Infertility at The Institute. Dr. Sable brings
an excellent reputation and leadership skills to the
program with experience in providing specialized care
to thousands of couples with fertility problems in
New York and New Jersey. He was educated and
trained at some of the most prestigious institutions
in the world, including the University of Pennsylvania,
New York Hospital, Cornell University, Brigham and
Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Between
1993 and 1998, Dr. Sable was the Associate Director
of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at Saint
Barnabas. He has been in private practice in
New York and a member of the Department of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists at St. Luke’s ––Roosevelt
Hospital Center in New York.
Margaret Graf Garrisi, M.D., who is board-certified
in both Obstetrics and Gynecology, comes to Saint Barnabas
as the new Medical Director of the Assisted Reproduction
Program. From 1987 until 1999, she was an Associate
Professor (Obstetrics & Gynecology) in the Center
for Reproductive Medicine at the Weill Cornell Medical
Center, where she also completed her residency training
in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Dr. Garrisi completed
her Fellowship in Reproductive Endocrinology at Mount
Sinai Medical Center. She has been an attending physician
in IVF, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
for more than 14 years.
Serena H. Chen, M.D., a board-certified
reproductive endocrinologist, joins the Institute as
the new Associate Director of the Division of Reproductive
Endocrinology and Infertility. Dr. Chen completed both
her residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology and her
fellowship in Reproductive Endocrinology at Johns Hopkins
Hospital. Before she joined Long Island IVF, she was
on the teaching staff at Johns Hopkins University School
of Medicine and an attending physician at Johns Hopkins
Bayview Medical Center.
Also on the Institute team, attending
physician Patricia Hughes, M.D., received her B.A.
from Mount Holyoke College and her doctorate from Albany
Medical College. She completed a four-year residency
in Obstetrics and Gynecology at St. Luke’s––Roosevelt
Hospital Center and a two-year fellowship in Reproductive
Endocrinology at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center. She
was on the teaching staff at Columbia University College
of Physicians and Surgeons and served as Medical Director
of the IVF Program at Saint Barnabas from 1993-1995.
The best physicians, scientists and infertility
team, extensive support services and a compassionate
staff help couples manage the complex issues associated
with infertility and its treatment. For an appointment
or information, please call (973) 322-8286.
[ top ]
Understanding
the Pill All Over Again
Recent advertisement tells us, “this is not
your father’s Oldsmobile.” A similar
statement could be made that “this is not your
mother’s birth control pill” when discussing
the changes that have occurred since the first use
of this oral contraceptive.
When oral contraceptives were introduced in the United
States in 1960, many women believed they had found
the answer to their need for convenient, safe and reliable
birth control. By 1965, “the pill” was
America’s leading contraceptive. With the
1970’s came disillusionment; the pill was not
perfect. While it was highly effective and convenient,
it had many minor side effects and a few serious ones. Though
severe complications were rare, pill scare reports
created an aura of danger and pill use subsequently
dropped in the mid-70’s. Today the pill
has been put into perspective. It is not for
everyone, but recent studies show it to be safe and
effective for most women from early adolescence through
menopause.
Ten years ago, physicians often prescribed birth control
pills with 100 to 150 micrograms of estrogen. Today
our best pill has no more than 50 micrograms of estrogen
with some containing as little as 20 micrograms of
estrogen. This new version is just as effective
as the pill of yesteryear but not nearly as plagued
by the risks and side effects. Taken properly,
the pill is about 98 to 99 percent effective.
For some women, health conditions make use of the
pill unsafe. Using pills with estrogen is too
risky for women who have had blood clots, heart attack,
or stroke, known or suspected breast cancer or cancer
of the uterine lining, undiagnosed abnormal vaginal
bleeding, liver tumors or pregnancy.
Despite widespread publicity on the pill’s drawbacks,
its benefits are substantial. It is still the
most popular reversible birth control method in America,
with an estimated eight to nine million women taking
it daily. For most healthy women in their thirties
or forties, there is no reason at all to stop taking
the pill, and benefits can be substantial.
Birth control has a bonus for the mature woman; the
pill lowers the risk of both ovarian and uterine cancers
and helps bones stay b. It may help prevent unnecessary
hysterectomies, and it even seems to soothe the mood
swings, insomnia, and hot flashes that begin to bother
some women years before menopause, or the “peri” (around)
menopause stage as we currently refer to it.
Not that the pill’s first advantage– easy
and dependable birth control – is something to
take for granted.
As women go through their forties, monthly cycles
can become capricious and surprise pregnancies are
a distinct possibility. By supplying low but
steady doses of estrogen and progesterone, the pill
shuts down the natural production of these hormones,
eliminating the peaks and valleys that trigger ovulation. On
the pill’s hormonal plateau, cycles stay as regular
as clockwork.
Regular cycles are important because erratic cycles
pose problems even if they do not lead to an unplanned
pregnancy. The first step for any woman having
abnormal bleeding past the age of 35 is to make sure
that there is not an underlying problem such as polyps
or uterine cancer. Evaluation requires a visit
to the obstetrician/gynecologist and if tests show
nothing wrong, the pill can avert “nuisance” bleeding
and hysterectomies.
In the largest investigation to date, the Cancer and
Steroid Hormone Study (CASH) reveals short term use
of the pill cuts a woman’s risk of uterine cancer
by forty percent. Her danger drops further the
longer she uses the pill. Because ovarian cancer
rarely announces itself until malignant cells have
begun to spread, the CASH study gives the same forty
percent decreased risk and women were better defended
the longer they had been on the pill.
Another plus: the pill helps keep the skeleton sound. We
all understand that bone mass starts eroding once menopause
arrives (up to twenty percent in five years). Since
menopause doesn’t happen all of the sudden, there
would be estrogens on board to help prevent the earliest
start of osteoporosis.
In addition, even though we really do not know what
causes premenstrual syndrome (PMS), physicians frequently
hear that PMS seems to get worse as patients age. The
pill helps reduce and ease these mood swings.
Protection against pregnancy, osteoporosis, cancer,
perimenopause and PMS symptoms is a large benefit from
one tiny pill. This is precisely why more women
today in their thirties and forties are using the pill. The
pill offers less risk of contraception, less water
retention, less weight gain and fewer migraine headaches,
in other words fewer side effects and significant protection
in more ways than one. The benefits offered by
the pill look more alluring these days than they did
decades ago when the method set off a sexual revolution. Now
it is clear that the pill has advantages for the body
and spirit as well as the libido.
[ top ]
Division
of Gynecologic Oncology Awarded Membership
into Prestigious National Cancer Group
Saint Barnabas Medical Center, through the Division
of Gynecologic Oncology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery,
has become one of only four health care institutions
in New Jersey to be chosen as a member of the prestigious
National Cancer Institute-funded Gynecologic Oncology
Group (GOG).
“This membership is another example of how our
Division at Saint Barnabas can offer the most up-to-date
and most ethically supervised patient protocols and
the most current treatment for gynecologic cancer management,” says
Robert Taylor, M.D., Associate Director of the Division
at the Medical Center.
John R. Kellner, administrator of the GOG, reports
that membership is awarded to centers that treat a
large number of gynecologic cancers and adhere to strict
research protocols and conscientious follow-up care.
The GOG is the only national cooperative group that
works exclusively with female pelvic cancers.
“We are doing the majority of research in women’s
gynecologic malignancies and our member institutions
have access to the latest treatments,” says
Mr. Kellner.
Through Saint Barnabas’ membership, patients
of The Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Reconstructive
Pelvic Surgery are given the opportunity to partake
of new protocol treatments. Those who choose not to
participate in protocols still reap the benefits of
the Medical Center’s membership, says Dr. Taylor.
“When you have a centralized group collecting
as much information as possible about these terrible
tumors, the information comes much faster and this
assists us in the treatment of all of our patients,” Dr.
Taylor relates.
In order to gain membership to the GOG, Saint Barnabas’ Division
had to make a formal application showing large patient
volume, appropriately sophisticated equipment and physical
operations, a highly skilled staff and overall excellence
in patient care. Saint Barnabas also has an institutional
review board to further scrutinize and refine all patient
treatments.
The Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Reconstructive
Pelvic Surgery, part of the Department of Obstetrics
and Gynecology at Saint Barnabas, is led by Chairman
James Breen, M.D. Dr. Breen is also a renowned
physician in the field of gynecologic oncology/surgery
and received the 1995 NJ Governor’s Clara Barton
Medical Service Award, the highest honor the state
can bestow on a person, for his outstanding medical
care of women. Dr. Breen and Assistant Department Chair
Caterina Gregori, M.D., Thad Denehy, M.D., Associate
Director of the Division, and Dr. Taylor comprise the
medical staff of The Division of Gynecologic Oncology
and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery.
For further information about The Division of Gynecologic
Oncology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery Saint Barnabas
Medical Center, please call (973) 322-5280.
[ top ]
Women,
Mood and Food Cravings
Can you eat just one cookie or do they keep calling
from the cupboard until they are all gone? Do
you sometimes feel an overwhelming urge that only chocolate
or potato chips will satisfy? Do you eat when
you are upset, lonely, stressed or angry? For
most women, forgoing favorite foods at certain times
is not only unthinkable; it seems beyond our ability
to control. When women eat in response to emotion
or moods, rather than in response to true physical
hunger it is called emotional eating or food cravings.
Approximately 97% of women experience food cravings
according to a survey conducted by H.P. Weingarten,
Ph.D., (Appetite, Dec. 91). Despite the fact
that cravings are so widespread, research is lacking
a scientific explanation as to why they arise.
At what point does the desire for food become sufficiently
intense to be termed a craving? A scientific
definition of food craving does not exist; a craving
is self-reported and is influenced by the person’s
view of the intensity of the craving.
True hunger is a biological and physiological response
in which the body tells the brain that nourishment
is needed.
If you are truly hungry, your body feels stomach pangs,
intestinal rumblings and a headache may occur. When
you are hungry, any number of foods can satisfy you. The
brain regulates hunger, how much you eat and what you
eat. Food’s sensory appeal (how a food
smells, looks or how you remember it tasting) can be
the trigger that stimulates the brain. Hunger
may also start at a cellular level when messages are
sent to the brain that fuel is needed.
A craving, however, is a highly specialized, emotionally-based,
intense desire to eat a particular type of food. During
a craving, the desire may be so b, you might go out
of your way to get the food. When you are craving
chocolate cake, carrot sticks just won’t cut
it. Food cravings may be dictated by time of
day with late afternoon or early evening as the prime
time for cravings to occur. Hormones also play
a role; pregnancy and the menstrual cycle are common
times for food cravings. Dieters, especially
those who frequently go on and off diets, experience
cravings most often.
Scientists have proposed many theories for why food
cravings exist. One idea is that food cravings
reflect the body’s need for a specific nutrient.
Another is that food deprivation, such as following
a calorie-restricted diet, induces cravings. Additional
theories are that people may crave foods because they
contain substances that influence brain chemistry;
or food cravings may be due to hormonal changes. Finally,
perhaps food cravings can be attributed to sensory
and psychosocial factors because people simply enjoy
the food’s taste, texture, aroma or association
(popcorn with movies, birthday cake at a birthday party,
etc.) Research surrounding many of these theories
is conflicting.
The number one food craved by women is chocolate. Only
one study has been done to directly research this craving
(see Michener, Rozin, Physiological Behavior, 94). Participants
were given several samples which included a chocolate
bar, a capsule containing all ingredients found in
a chocolate bar and a capsule containing only flour
and water. The results revealed that only the
consumption of chocolate itself satisfied the craving,
bly suggesting that chocolate craving is due to its
sensory properties such as aroma, sweetness, texture
and psychological attributes rather than its actual
ingredients. Substances found in chocolate also
occur in other foods including pickled herring, cheddar
cheese, and pineapple juice, yet people seldom crave
these foods.
Mood affects eating, whether you are stressed, angry,
lonely or tired. Some people lose their appetite
while some eat more than usual, especially more “comfort
foods.” The more deeply you feel the effects
of your emotions, the more you are apt to eat. For
overweight women, this may be especially problematic. A
study conducted by Michael Lowe & Edwin Fisher,
Jr. (Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 83) compared
the emotional reactivity and emotional eating of normal
and overweight females. The results showed that
the overweight women were more likely to engage in
emotional eating than normal-weight females. The
more emotional the women were feeling, the more they
ate and the heaviest women were found to be the most
emotional in that study. If foods with pleasurable
tastes and textures are used as a reward or to provide
solace, then the psychological component for craving
such foods grows even ber.
Carbohydrates have been called “mood food” because
many women find comfort, calmness and improved mood
from eating them. Foods containing carbohydrates,
including starches and sweets (chocolate), increase
serotonin. Serotonin is a brain chemical that
regulates sleep, mood, food intake and pain tolerance. When
serotonin levels are high, you are less irritable.
Although further research is needed, it is believed
that when serotonin levels are low another chemical
in the brain called Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is stimulated
due to decreased carbohydrate storage in your body
and decreased blood sugar levels. When NPY is
stimulated, so is your desire for sweet and starchy
foods. This may explain why our favorite breakfast
foods (cereals, bagels, fruits, etc.) are rich in carbohydrates
since carbohydrate stores are depleted while you sleep. Skipping
breakfast increases NPY levels further so that by afternoon
you are set up for a carbohydrate binge. This
craving for carbohydrates is not the result of lack
of will power; it is your body at work. When
serotonin increases, NPY decreases, which tells your
body that you have had enough food. Stress and
dieting have been bly linked to stimulating this process
as well.
Excessive dieting interferes with appetite control. As
the body’s cells are fed, a chemical called cholecystokinin
(CCK) is released. This appetite control chemical
sends signals of fullness to the brain resulting in
your appetite being “turned off.” The
appetite control system is disrupted with chronic dieting. The
result is your body becomes desensitized to feelings
of fullness and oversensitized to feelings of hunger,
making it much more difficult to determine when you
are truly, physically hungry.
Hormonal states during the menstrual cycle influence
cravings. With menstruation there are decreased
levels of serotonin, causing depression. Serotonin
levels rise when increased amounts of carbohydrate
foods are eaten, producing a calming effect.
A survey reported in American Journal of Psychiatry
found that 36% of women reported severe cravings for
sweet foods, 7% for salty foods and 11% for other foods
before and during their menstrual cycle.
Pregnancy also influences a woman’s food cravings. Up
to 50% of women report food cravings during pregnancy,
especially during the first trimester. They most
frequently crave fruit, fruit juices, and sweet foods
including chocolate and dairy products. A possible
connection may be changes in olfactory and taste sensitivity
at this time as well as metabolic changes.
Currently, scientific research has not supported most
claims about the physiological basis of food cravings
or the association between food and mood. Women
who develop and practice healthy eating habits are
better able to manage their food intake and food cravings
throughout their life stages. If emotional eating
becomes excessive and interferes with lifestyle and
good health, seek professional help with a counselor
trained in eating problems.
[ top ]
Pelvic
Organ Prolapse---No Need to Suffer in Silence
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, which occurs when a female
organ such as the vagina or uterus protrudes through
connective tissue or cavity wall, has been described
in women throughout the ages. In lay terms, Pelvic
Organ Prolapse describes a herniation or protrusion
of the vagina and uterus (if present) along with or
without various organs such as small bowel (enterocele),
bladder (cystocele) and rectum (rectocele). Most
patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse have no symptoms. In
other cases, however, the condition may progress to
where the vagina, bladder and rectum are bulging between
the patient’s legs, severely affecting her hygiene
and quality of life.
Symptoms
The symptoms of Pelvic Organ Prolapse do not always
directly parallel the severity of the condition, but
are generally related to the type of defects.
Prolapse of the urethra (the tube that drains the
bladder), called an urethrocele, often causes symptoms
of stress incontinence. On the other hand, pure
bladder prolapse (cystocele) generally leads to two
complaints: the first being difficulty in voiding which
may be slow, intermittent, require straining, leaning
forward, momentary voiding with resting or manual upward
replacement of the protruding bladder. The second
symptom is the sensation that something is “bulging
out” with or without actual vaginal protrusion.
Not surprisingly, symptoms of a rectal prolapse center
on defecation. Soft stools are easily expelled;
however, bowel movements that are more firm, such as
those experienced in simple constipation, may pass
with great difficulty. Changes in dietary habits (i.e.
eating more fiber) and medications (i.e. using stool
softeners) will often correct simple constipation but
not the symptoms of a significant rectal prolapse,
due to the deep pocket formed by the bulging of the
rectum into the vagina.
Symptoms of rectal prolapse are most significant when
the pocket made by the protrusion is especially deep
and when stools are particularly firm. Rectal
prolapse may also be accompanied by the feeling of “something
coming out of the vagina.” Patients with
pure rectal prolapse have the chronic urge to move
their bowels, but cannot expel the stool for mechanical
reasons. Expulsion often requires pushing the
rectum back into place, splinting the vagina or tilting
the body to one side. Many patients often resort
to chronic laxative or enema use. On the other hand,
patients with chronic constipation have little or no
urge to defecate; however, they too, often use enemas
and laxatives.
Symptoms of uterovaginal prolapse and small bowel
prolapse (enterocele) are usually a feeling of heaviness,
fullness or pressure, as well as a sensation of a bulge,
with or without an actual protrusion. Standing
will often accentuate these symptoms, and conversely,
bedrest will relieve them. Pelvic pressure
that remains despite urinary voiding or bowel movement
is considered to be due to uterovaginal prolapse if
the uterus is in place or a small bowel prolapse if
the uterus has been surgically removed. Occasionally,
a patient will complain of an immediate recurrence
of vaginal prolapse after surgery for this condition.
In most instances, this signifies that an undetected
small bowel prolapse was not repaired at the time of
surgery and usually requires an additional procedure.
In general, and at all sites, symptoms tend to occur
relatively late in the process of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Rarely,
patients will complain of progressive incontinence
of stool or bowel gas, a serious and socially alienating
embarrassment. A surprising number of these patients
learn to control their problem by eating a constipating
diet and using adjacent muscles to more or less control
their incontinence, while others entirely remove themselves
from social interaction. These patients often
have experienced injury to the anal sphincter during
childbirth (perineal lacerations) which may not show
itself until years later, due to the progressive effects
of aging.
Causes
The specific cause of Pelvic Organ Prolapse is unknown. One
theory is that it occurs from damage sustained to the
pelvic nerves and muscles at childbirth. However,
previous pregnancy is not a prerequisite for prolapse
because it can be seen in women who have never been
pregnant, especially in those who have a congenitally
elongated cervix. Another theory is that Pelvic
Organ Prolapse may be a result of an inherent weakness
of connective tissue which loosens, stretches and ultimately
prolapses upon repeated pressure. Finally,
chronic constipation with a lifelong history of repeated
straining and pelvic pressure may lead to disruption
of the nerves supplying the pelvic muscles. This
damage may lead to a gradual weakening of these muscles,
resulting in prolapse. More than likely, the
actual cause is some combination of the above, which
research will hopefully reveal.
Treatment
Long before the modem surgical era, physicians attempted
various non-surgical methods to reduce Pelvic Organ
Prolapse, which eventually led to the development of
pessaries (devices worn in the vagina to support the
uterus), many of which have their origins in the nineteenth
century. Today, these pessaries are constructed
of medical grade silicon and are easily fitted into
most women for relief of symptoms. Pessaries
are usually reserved for those symptomatic patients
who do not want immediate surgical correction, as well
as for those patients who are not candidates for surgery
due to severe medical problems.
Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse is primarily surgical
with tailored reconstruction of the protruding organs
and supportive tissues. Most commonly, the surgery
is performed entirely through the vagina, eliminating
the need for an abdominal incision. Surgical
procedures include vaginal hysterectomy (with/without
removal of the ovaries and uterine tubes), bladder
repair (anterior colporrhaphy), rectal repair (posterior
colpoperineoplasty), and small bowel repair. Occasionally
additional procedures, such as urethral slings and
repair of old perineal lacerations, are required to
address specific problems. The surgeries usually
take between two and two and a half hours. Patients
are generally hospitalized for two to three days with
minimal discomfort.
Most gynecologists are trained in the treatment of
Pelvic Organ Prolapse and provide excellent repair
of these conditions. The Division of Gynecologic Oncology
and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery at Saint Barnabas
Medical Center serves as a regional referral center
for advanced, recurrent and unusual cases of Pelvic
Organ Prolapse and perineal lacerations. For
more information or for an appointment, please call
(973) 322-5280.
[ top ]
Ask
An Expert
Angela Wimmer, M.D., FACOG
Attending Saint Barnabas Physician, Obstetrics and
Gynecology, with offices in West Orange and North
Arlington
Q. Is sex during pregnancy dangerous to me
or my baby?
A. As with many things in life, if
it feels good, do it. Under most circumstances
sex during pregnancy is absolutely safe for both the
pregnant mother and her baby. The amniotic fluid
cushions the baby, thereby protecting him or her from
any injury. However in certain situations, such
as placenta previa, placental abruption or preterm
rupture of the membranes, intercourse may be discouraged. As
with all pregnancy issues, you should discuss your
individual medical situation with your obstetrician.
Anthony Quartell., M.D., FACOG
Attending Saint Barnabas Physician, Obstetrics and
Gynecology, with an office in Livingston
Q. What is an ectopic pregnancy?
A. The sperm and egg unite in the
fallopian tube. As the tiny embryo begins to
develop, the fallopian tube helps it pass into the
uterus where implantation occurs approximately five
to six days later. It is in this intrauterine
environment (the womb) in which the developing fetus
then grows to maturity. When the fertilized egg
gets “stuck” in the fallopian tube and
does not travel to its normal intrauterine location,
the pregnancy is referred to as a tubal, or ectopic,
pregnancy.
The early diagnosis of tubal or ectopic pregnancy
is a difficult one, in that it may have no symptoms
at all. In other cases, patients with ectopic pregnancies
may show spotting, cramping, bleeding and lower abdominal
pain, all symptoms which can be confused with either
a threatened miscarriage or, in most cases, a normal,
healthy pregnancy. Predisposing factors to ectopic
pregnancy include the history of a prior tubal pregnancy
and the history of pelvic inflammatory disease or infections.
Your physician is aware of the danger
of ectopic pregnancy and has been carefully trained
to sharpen his or her diagnostic acuity with regard
to this possibility. It is certainly the patient’s
responsibility, however, to notify her physician of
the signs and symptoms which we have described. Etopic
pregnancy can be treated either surgically or medically,
affording an excellent outcome in most cases. The
fact that a patient has had one or two previous ectopic
pregnancies is not a barrier to conceiving again, nor
to having a healthy child. |