Physicians perform hysterectomy – the surgical removal
of the uterus – to treat a wide variety of uterine conditions.
Each year in the U.S. alone, doctors perform approximately
600,000 hysterectomies, making it the second most common surgical
procedure.1

There are various types of hysterectomy
that are performed depending on the patient’s diagnosis:
- Supracervical hysterectomy – removes the uterus,
leaves cervix intact
- Total hysterectomy – removes the
uterus and cervix
- Radical hysterectomy or modified radical hysterectomy – a
more extensive surgery for gynecologic cancer that includes
removing the uterus and cervix and may also remove part of
the vagina, fallopian tubes, ovaries and lymph nodes in order
to stage the cancer (determine how far it has spread).
Surgeons perform the majority of
hysterectomies using an “open” approach,
which is through a large abdominal incision. An open approach
to the hysterectomy procedure requires a 6-12 inch incision.
When cancer is involved, the conventional treatment has always
been open surgery using a large abdominal incision, in order
to see and, if necessary, remove related structures like the
cervix or the ovaries.
A second approach to hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy,
involves removal of the uterus through the vagina, without
any external incision or subsequent scarring. Surgeons most
often use this minimally invasive approach if the patient’s
condition is benign (non-cancerous), when the uterus is normal
size and the condition is limited to the uterus.
In laparoscopic hysterectomy, the uterus is removed either
vaginally or through small incisions made in the abdomen. The
surgeon can see the target anatomy on a standard 2D video monitor
thanks to a miniaturized camera, inserted into the abdomen
through the small incisions. A laparoscopic approach offers
surgeons better visualization of affected structures than either
vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy alone.
While minimally invasive vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies
offer obvious potential advantages to patients over open abdominal
hysterectomy – including reduced risk for complications,
a shorter hospitalization and faster recovery – there
are inherent drawbacks. With vaginal hysterectomy, surgeons
are challenged by a small working space and lack of view to
the pelvic organs. Additional conditions can make the vaginal
approach difficult, including when the patient has:
- A narrow pubic arch (an area between the hip bones where
they come together)2
- Thick adhesions due to prior pelvic surgery,
such as C-section3
- Severe endometriosis 4
- Non-localized cancer (cancer outside
the uterus) requiring more extensive tissue removal, including
lymph nodes
With laparoscopic hysterectomy, surgeons may be limited in
their dexterity and by 2D visualization, potentially reducing
the surgeon's precision and control when compared with traditional
abdominal surgery.
A new, minimally invasive approach to
hysterectomy, da Vinci Hysterectomy, combines the advantages
of conventional open and minimally invasive hysterectomies – but with far
fewer drawbacks. da Vinci Hysterectomy is becoming the treatment
of choice for many surgeons worldwide. It is performed using
the da Vinci System, which enables surgeons to perform surgicall
procedures with unmatched precision, dexterity and control.
Read about what may be the most effective, least invasive approach
to hysterectomy – da
Vinci Hysterectomy.
- Center for Disease Control. Keshavarz H, Hillis S,
Kieke B, Marchbanks P. Hysterectomy Surveillance — United
States, 1994–1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report. Surveillance Summaries. July 12, 2002. Vol. 51
/ SS-5. Page 1. www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/ss/ss5105.pdf
- Harmanli
OH, Khilnani R, Dandolu V, Chatwani AJ. Narrow pubic arch
and increased risk of failure for vaginal hysterectomy.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):697-700.
- Paparella P, Sizzi
O, Rossetti A, De Benedittis F, Paparella R. Vaginal hysterectomy
in generally considered contraindications to vaginal surgery.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004 Sep;270(2):104-9. Epub 2003 Jul
10.
- Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L,
Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005
Jun 25;330(7506):1478. Review.
While clinical studies support the effectiveness
of the da Vinci® System when used in minimally invasive
surgery, individual results may vary. Surgery with the
da Vinci Surgical System may not be appropriate for every
individual. Always ask your doctor about all treatment
options, as well as their risks and benefits.
For additional information on minimally invasive surgery
with the da Vinci® Surgical System visit www.davincisurgery.com |
[ top ]
|
|
|